Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: disable rpoplpush when cache mode is enabled with list structure #2960

Conversation

cheniujh
Copy link
Collaborator

@cheniujh cheniujh commented Dec 3, 2024

更新:暂时不合并本PR,尽量在cache模式下实现rpoplpush即可,并不是一定要禁用。

本PR修复 ISSUE #2953 , 在cache模式下禁用了rpoplpush命令。

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced command handling for list operations, including checks for caching compatibility.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error responses for unsupported commands in cache mode.
  • Refactor

    • Removed unnecessary global variable to streamline the codebase.
  • Documentation

    • Clarified variable initialization for better understanding of intended values.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the PikaConf class in the include/pika_conf.h file, specifically updating the initialization of two member variables using bitwise operations instead of multiplication. Additionally, the src/pika_list.cc file sees updates to the RPopLPushCmd class, including checks for caching compatibility and error handling adjustments. A global variable declaration is also removed, indicating a potential codebase simplification.

Changes

File Change Summary
include/pika_conf.h - Updated blob_file_size_ initialization from 256 * 1024 * 1024 to 256 << 20.
- Updated throttle_bytes_per_second_ initialization from 200 << 20 to 200MB/s.
src/pika_list.cc - Removed global variable g_pika_rm.
- Updated RPopLPushCmd::DoInitial() to add cache mode check.
- Updated RPopLPushCmd::ReadCache() to return error for cache mode.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: a new strategy for auto compaction (ospp 2024) #2816: The changes in the PikaConf class regarding variable initialization may relate to the enhancements in storage options and configuration handling in the PikaServer class, as both involve adjustments to configuration parameters that could impact overall system behavior.

Suggested labels

✏️ Feature, 4.0.1

Suggested reviewers

  • dingxiaoshuai123

🐰 In the code where the numbers play,
A shift to the left brightens the day.
With caching checks and lists in tow,
We hop along, making code flow!
Each change a step, so clever and neat,
In the land of Pika, our work is complete! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ☢️ Bug Something isn't working label Dec 3, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/pika_list.cc (1)

787-790: LGTM! Consider improving the error message clarity.

The implementation correctly disables the RPOPLPUSH command when cache mode is enabled with list structure, aligning with the PR objective. However, the error message could be more descriptive.

Consider this more descriptive error message:

-    res_.SetRes(CmdRes::kErrOther, "the command is not supported when cache&list is enabled");
+    res_.SetRes(CmdRes::kErrOther, "RPOPLPUSH command is not supported when cache mode is enabled with list structure");
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c155a5 and c074f88.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • include/pika_conf.h (1 hunks)
  • src/pika_list.cc (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • include/pika_conf.h
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/pika_list.cc (1)

787-790: Verify consistent error handling across similar commands

Let's verify if this change is consistently implemented across related commands and if there are any other occurrences of RPOPLPUSH that need similar handling.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the RPOPLPUSH implementation and similar list commands.


Let me check one more aspect to see how other list commands handle cache-related operations.


Cache mode check is unique to RPOPLPUSH and appears to be correctly implemented

The verification shows that:

  • The cache mode check is specifically implemented for RPOPLPUSH command, which makes sense as it's a complex atomic operation involving two lists
  • The error handling is consistent within the RPOPLPUSH implementation, with similar error messages in both DoInitial() and ReadCache() methods
  • Other list commands don't have similar restrictions, which is appropriate as they are simpler operations that can work with cache
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other RPOPLPUSH usages and similar cache mode checks

# Check for other RPOPLPUSH occurrences
echo "Checking for other RPOPLPUSH usages..."
rg -l "RPOPLPUSH|rpoplpush" --type cpp

# Check for similar cache mode handling patterns
echo "Checking for similar cache mode handling patterns..."
rg "cache_mode\(\)" --type cpp -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 3800


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check RPOPLPUSH implementation and similar list commands for cache handling

# Find RPOPLPUSH implementation
echo "Checking RPOPLPUSH implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class RPopLPushCmd {
  $$$
}'

# Check other list command implementations for cache handling
echo "Checking other list commands for cache handling..."
rg "class \w+Cmd.*List" src/pika_list.cc -A 5

# Check if there are other similar cache checks in list commands
echo "Checking cache checks in list commands..."
rg "cache_mode\(\)" src/pika_list.cc -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 661


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check list commands implementations and their cache handling

# Find all list command classes and their DoInitial methods
echo "Checking list command implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Cmd : public Cmd {
  $$$
  void DoInitial() {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}' src/pika_list.cc

# Find all cache-related error messages in list commands
echo "Checking cache-related error messages..."
rg "SetRes.*cache" src/pika_list.cc -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 690

@cheniujh cheniujh closed this Dec 3, 2024
@cheniujh cheniujh reopened this Dec 4, 2024
@cheniujh cheniujh closed this Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☢️ Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant