-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
OP-TED ePO Discussions
Pinned Discussions
Sort by:
Latest activity
Categories, most helpful, and community links
Categories
Most helpful
Be sure to mark someone’s comment as an answer if it helps you resolve your question — they deserve the credit!
Community links
Discussions
-
You must be logged in to vote 💡 Glossary - Catalogue Request
type: feature requestsomething requested to be implemented in a future release module: eCatalogueeCatalogue -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 💬 -
You must be logged in to vote 💬 -
You must be logged in to vote #️⃣ -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 every term must have a definition
type: feature requestsomething requested to be implemented in a future release module: ePO coreePO core -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 Remove unnecessary model-owl files from ePO repo
type: feature requestsomething requested to be implemented in a future release act: for internal discussionit needs to be discussed within the team module: noneno module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 widoco for dereferencing
type: feature requestsomething requested to be implemented in a future release act: for internal discussionit needs to be discussed within the team module: noneno module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature -
You must be logged in to vote #️⃣ OPT concepts that should not be used anymore
aux: mappingit is related to the TED-SWS mappings project type: questionsomething needs clarified, refined or decided module: ePO coreePO core aux: alignmentalignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO -
You must be logged in to vote #️⃣ Connect all dates fields to the correct ePO concepts
aux: mappingit is related to the TED-SWS mappings project module: ePO coreePO core act: for internal discussionit needs to be discussed within the team aux: alignmentalignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Tenderer, Winner, Contractor, Seller what is the relation between these different concepts?
type: questionsomething needs clarified, refined or decided module: ePO coreePO core -
You must be logged in to vote #️⃣ How to model Tenderers consisting of multiple Organisations?
module: ePO coreePO core module: eSubmissioneSubmission aux: alignmentalignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO -
You must be logged in to vote #️⃣ Investigate redundancy regarding criterion and Reserved-procurement authority tables
module: eSubmissioneSubmission aux: alignmentalignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 Unable to specify or represent an organisation part/department since ePO 4.0-rc.2
aux: mappingit is related to the TED-SWS mappings project type: feature requestsomething requested to be implemented in a future release module: ePO coreePO core -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 Suggestions for Release-notes
module: noneno module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 allow multiple legal names
type: feature requestsomething requested to be implemented in a future release module: noneno module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature -
You must be logged in to vote 💬 -
You must be logged in to vote 💬 -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 Rename "Purchase Contract" as "Specific Contract"
type: feature requestsomething requested to be implemented in a future release module: eContracteContract act: for internal discussionit needs to be discussed within the team -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 Questions on Durations for Lot and Contract To Be Checked
type: questionsomething needs clarified, refined or decided module: ePO coreePO core act: for internal discussionit needs to be discussed within the team -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 consider using W3C CUBE patterns for representing counts
type: feature requestsomething requested to be implemented in a future release act: for internal discussionit needs to be discussed within the team module: noneno module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature -
You must be logged in to vote 💡 add more
type: feature requestFunctionalProperty
annotationssomething requested to be implemented in a future release act: for implementationit can be implemented and closed, all is clear module: noneno module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature