Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cvs: adopt and modernize #347762

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

cvs: adopt and modernize #347762

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member

Besides migrating to by-name and reformatting, it also picks the patches from their pristine locations.
Since at least the xz-incident we should strive to use pristine sources whenever possible.

Closes #347374 (hopefully)

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2024 15:43
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

@joshuakb2 can you please test this PR?

@joshuakb2
Copy link

@AndersonTorres sure, I'll let you know when I've tested it.

@joshuakb2
Copy link

@AndersonTorres yes, this cvs build is working for me. It does not try to use rsh.

@joshuakb2
Copy link

@AndersonTorres since the cvs binary is now built with a direct reference to the SSH executable, do you think the ssh package
to use should also be configurable? Or the text editor, for that matter?

@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 labels Oct 10, 2024
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

I don't think it matters so much.

The current method for customization has some annoying pitfalls; e.g. optional parameters can possibly clash with existing or future packages - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/342692/files#r1785284171

Besides, I am waiting Atemu's experiments at #312432 before trying anything too savage in terms of customization.
For now the defaults established here are good enough.

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/2051

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4809

@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Nov 10, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Nov 15, 2024
AndersonTorres and others added 4 commits December 9, 2024 20:06
- hammer
- nixfmt-rfc-style
- finalAttrs
- no nested with
- meta.mainProgram
This removes that uncanny preConfigure.
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

AndersonTorres commented Dec 9, 2024

Closing since I no longer have time to deal with this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 101-500 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants