Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 12, 2021. It is now read-only.

[Idea] Alternative order of the RBAC cascade #62

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

recmo
Copy link
Contributor

@recmo recmo commented Aug 31, 2017

This is an idea, we give local/global a priority over everyone/specific. It's an alternative to the current order.

I'm sure one of these orders makes way more sense that the other. But I don't know which one. So I'm posting this PR to discuss.

@recmo recmo changed the title Alternative order of the RBAC cascade [Idea] Alternative order of the RBAC cascade Aug 31, 2017
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 31, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #62 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #62   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.33%   74.33%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines         861      861           
  Branches      177      177           
=======================================
  Hits          640      640           
  Misses        221      221
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
contracts/AccessControl/RoleBasedAccessControl.sol 67.85% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b69f987...ce9c27a. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant