Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reimplement DY #2248

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Reimplement DY #2248

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

peterkrack
Copy link
Contributor

@peterkrack peterkrack commented Dec 11, 2024

Things to fix

DYE866_Z0_800GEV:

  • Central values differ.

DYE866_Z0_800GEV_DW_RATIO:

  • Different values for the rapidity.

DYE605_Z0_38P8GEV_DW:

  • 999 instead of 1000 replicas to determine uncertainties.

Copy link
Member

@Radonirinaunimi Radonirinaunimi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @peterkrack! Happy new year and thanks for this!

Here are some preliminary comments:

Could you please take of these first before I can move further into the details of the implementation?

@Radonirinaunimi
Copy link
Member

Hi @peterkrack, please let me know if there is anything I can help with in the meantime.

@Radonirinaunimi
Copy link
Member

I was wondering if there are some updates regarding the pending issues above and whether some helps are needed?

@peterkrack
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was wondering if there are some updates regarding the pending issues above and whether some helps are needed?

For DYE605_Z0_38P8GEV_DW is suspect it is a bug in the old buildmaster. The other two I have to figure out what exactly is causing the discrepancy between legacy and reimplementation.

@Radonirinaunimi
Copy link
Member

I was wondering if there are some updates regarding the pending issues above and whether some helps are needed?

For DYE605_Z0_38P8GEV_DW is suspect it is a bug in the old buildmaster. The other two I have to figure out what exactly is causing the discrepancy between legacy and reimplementation.

I can also have a look in details, but would you be able to take care of #2248 (review) above?

@Radonirinaunimi Radonirinaunimi dismissed their stale review January 21, 2025 07:59

Already resolved!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants