Spread the new year cheer all over IRuntimeRegistry

[nulltoken]

Pull request description

Context:

In order to not have scheduled jobs interfere with unit test runs, I leverage IRuntimeRegistry.RemoveJob<T> in my Xunit Collection fixtures.

As I'd rather disable them (in order to later be able to trigger them through the IInstantJobRegistry), I started working on making DisableJob() accept IJob typed parameters.

Getting there, it was only making sense to also consider EnableJob().

Along the road, I discovered some inconsistencies nearby that I also worked on.

Most relevant proposed changes:

• Expose typed version of DisableJob()
• Expose typed version of EnableJob()
• Make RemoveJob() behave according to its documentation
• Ensure UpdateSchedule() behavior is consistent

PR meta checklist

• Pull request is targeted at main branch for code
• Pull request is linked to all related issues, if any.

Code PR specific checklist

• My code follows the code style of this project and AspNetCore coding guidelines.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have updated the appropriate sub section in the CHANGELOG.md.
• I have added, updated or removed tests to according to my changes.
  • All tests passed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/NCronJob/Registry/IInstantJobRegistry.cs	90.56% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NCronJob/Registry/JobRegistry.cs	98.01% <100.00%> (+2.14%)	⬆️
src/NCronJob/Registry/RuntimeJobRegistry.cs	97.84% <100.00%> (+0.62%)	⬆️
src/NCronJob/Scheduler/JobWorker.cs	93.28% <100.00%> (+4.13%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[linkdotnet]

That is quite some new years joy ;)
And happy new year to you :D

[nulltoken]

@linkdotnet Changelog and doco have been updated. Could you please take another look?

[linkdotnet]

Steven like and appreciate your efforts :D

Thank you very much <3