feat: weglot impl #158
feat: weglot impl #158
Conversation
|
@bitfalt is attempting to deploy a commit to the MindVault Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes reorganize the provider hierarchy in the root layout by introducing a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant RL as RootLayout
participant WP as WeglotProvider
participant TP as ThemeProvider
participant NP as NotificationsProvider
participant EP as ErudaProvider
participant DS as Weglot Script Loader
RL->>WP: Render RootLayout
WP->>WP: Check for API key
alt API key present
WP->>DS: Load Weglot Library (Script 1)
WP->>DS: Initialize Weglot with API key (Script 2)
else API key absent
WP->>Console: Log warning
end
WP->>TP: Render ThemeProvider
TP->>NP: Render NotificationsProvider
NP->>EP: Render ErudaProvider
EP->>RL: Render LayoutContent with children
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for lucent-florentine-971919 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/web/src/providers/WeglotProvider.tsx (2)
6-8: Consider adding configuration props for Weglot initialization.The component could be more flexible by accepting additional configuration options such as
languages,defaultLanguage, etc., instead of only using the API key.interface WeglotProviderProps { children: ReactNode + languages?: string[] + defaultLanguage?: string + // Add other Weglot configuration options as needed }
11-14: Enhance error handling and logging.Consider using a more robust error handling approach:
- Log additional context about the environment
- Consider throwing an error in development mode
if (!process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WEGLOT_API_KEY) { - console.warn('Missing NEXT_PUBLIC_WEGLOT_API_KEY environment variable') + const message = 'Missing NEXT_PUBLIC_WEGLOT_API_KEY environment variable' + console.warn(message, { + environment: process.env.NODE_ENV, + context: 'WeglotProvider initialization' + }) + if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { + throw new Error(message) + } return <>{children}</> }apps/web/src/app/layout.tsx (1)
43-57: Fix indentation in provider hierarchy.The indentation of the providers is inconsistent. The
MiniKitProvideris not properly aligned with its siblings.<WeglotProvider> <ThemeProvider> <NotificationsProvider> <ErudaProvider> - <MiniKitProvider> + <MiniKitProvider> <div className="mx-auto w-full min-h-screen overflow-hidden">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/src/app/layout.tsx(3 hunks)apps/web/src/providers/WeglotProvider.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/src/app/layout.tsx (1)
43-57:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify provider ordering impact.
The WeglotProvider is now wrapping all other providers. Verify that this ordering doesn't affect:
- Theme switching functionality
- Notification system
- Development tools (Eruda)
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any theme, notification, or Eruda initialization that might depend on DOM elements rg -A 5 "initialize|init|setup" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 82
Action Required: Verify Provider Ordering Impact
We need to ensure that wrapping all providers with the WeglotProvider does not inadvertently affect:
- Theme Switching: Confirm that the ThemeProvider still applies themes correctly.
- Notification System: Ensure that NotificationsProvider functions as expected.
- Development Tools (Eruda): Verify that ErudaProvider initializes without issues.
Note: The earlier search command using
--type tsxfailed due to an unrecognized file type. To improve verification, please run the following shell script to search both.tsand.tsxfiles:#!/bin/bash # Re-run search using custom glob patterns for both .ts and .tsx files rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -A 5 "initialize|init|setup"Review any findings manually to confirm that none of the provider-related initialization routines (or DOM-dependent setups) rely on the previous provider ordering.
| <Script | ||
| id="weglot-js" | ||
| src="https://cdn.weglot.com/weglot.min.js" | ||
| strategy="beforeInteractive" | ||
| /> | ||
| <Script |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using onError handler for script loading failures.
Add error handling to detect and handle script loading failures.
<Script
id="weglot-js"
src="https://cdn.weglot.com/weglot.min.js"
strategy="beforeInteractive"
+ onError={(e) => {
+ console.error('Failed to load Weglot script:', e)
+ }}
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Script | |
| id="weglot-js" | |
| src="https://cdn.weglot.com/weglot.min.js" | |
| strategy="beforeInteractive" | |
| /> | |
| <Script | |
| <Script | |
| id="weglot-js" | |
| src="https://cdn.weglot.com/weglot.min.js" | |
| strategy="beforeInteractive" | |
| onError={(e) => { | |
| console.error('Failed to load Weglot script:', e) | |
| }} | |
| /> | |
| <Script |
| <Script | ||
| id="weglot-init" | ||
| strategy="beforeInteractive" | ||
| dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ | ||
| __html: ` | ||
| Weglot.initialize({ | ||
| api_key: "${process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WEGLOT_API_KEY}", | ||
| }); | ||
| ` | ||
| }} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Security concern: API key exposure in client-side code.
The API key is currently exposed in the client-side JavaScript. Consider:
- Using a backend proxy to initialize Weglot
- Implementing proper CSP headers
Let's verify if the API key needs to be protected:
🌐 Web query:
Does Weglot API key need to be protected or is it safe to expose in client-side code?
💡 Result:
Weglot API keys should not be exposed in client-side code and require protection despite some conflicting information from different sources[1][3][5][6]. Here's the breakdown:
Key Security Considerations
-
Public vs Secret Keys
- Weglot uses public API keys for frontend integration[1][10], but these still require domain whitelisting via their support team[1].
- Unlike Zoom's public-facing JWT keys[3], Weglot keys grant translation management access and aren't inherently safe for full exposure.
-
Documentation vs Reality
- While Weglot's API examples show direct key usage[4][10], security researchers have flagged exposed keys as vulnerabilities[5].
- General security guidelines strongly advise against client-side exposure of any credentials[2][6].
-
Proven Risks
- Exposed keys allow:
▸ Unauthorized translation modifications
▸ Access to translation memory/analytics[1]
▸ Potential billing abuse through API overuse
- Exposed keys allow:
Recommended Protection Methods
| Approach | Implementation | Security Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Backend Proxy | Route requests through services like Buildship/Supabase[5][6] | Full key isolation |
| Domain Whitelisting | Contact Weglot support to restrict authorized domains[1] | Prevents external misuse |
| Environment Variables | Store keys server-side (never in frontend code)[2][6] | Avoids accidental exposure |
When Client-Side Use Might Seem Acceptable
// Example from Weglot documentation[10]:
fetch('https://api.weglot.com/translate', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({
api_key: 'PUBLIC_KEY_HERE', // Still requires whitelisting
l_from: 'en',
l_to: 'fr',
words: [{w: 'Hello'}]
})
})This only works safely if:
- Domain is whitelisted with Weglot[1]
- Key has strict rate limits[2]
- No sensitive translation data exists[1]
Best Practice Summary
- Never hardcode keys in frontend repositories[2][5]
- Use backend middleware for all API interactions[5][6]
- Regularly rotate keys and monitor usage[2][10]
- Whitelist domains/IPs through Weglot support[1]
While Weglot's implementation might appear client-friendly initially[10], responsible security practices demand treating these keys as sensitive credentials requiring protection[2][5][6].
Citations:
- 1: https://support.weglot.com/article/356-weglot-security
- 2: https://www.legitsecurity.com/blog/api-key-security-best-practices
- 3: https://devforum.zoom.us/t/safe-to-use-api-key-in-client-side-code/59412
- 4: https://github.com/streaak/keyhacks
- 5: https://discourse.webflow.com/t/how-do-you-store-use-secret-api-key-data/178977
- 6: https://community.weweb.io/t/is-the-api-key-in-the-rest-api-secure/3619
- 7: https://www.redpacketsecurity.com/keyhacks-a-repository-which-shows-quick-ways-in-which-api-keys-leaked-by-a-bug-bounty-program-can-be-checked-to-see-if-theyre-valid/
- 8: http://support.weglot.com/article/72-wordpress-integration-setup
- 9: https://www.weglot.com/guides/client-multilingual-project
- 10: https://developers.weglot.com/api/reference
Security Alert: Exposed Weglot API Key in Client-Side Code
After reviewing the latest guidance on Weglot API key security, it’s clear that even though Weglot documentation shows direct client-side usage, exposing the key through process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WEGLOT_API_KEY can still lead to unauthorized translation modifications, potential abuse of analytics, and billing risks. To mitigate these risks, please consider the following improvements:
- Implement a Backend Proxy: Move the Weglot initialization logic to a secure backend endpoint to shield the API key.
- Enhance Security Measures: Along with domain whitelisting (by coordinating with Weglot support), enforce strict Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to further protect against misuse.
File: apps/web/src/providers/WeglotProvider.tsx (Lines: 23-33)
Please update this implementation to prevent exposing sensitive credentials on the client side.
Summary by CodeRabbit