Another dev/fix feedback issues

[Another-DevX]

Description

Please include a summary of the change and if relevant which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Dependency changes
• Code refactor / cleanup
• Documentation or wording changes
• Other

How should this be tested?

Please provide instructions so we can test. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.

• Test A
• Test B

Visual context

Please provide any relevant visual context for UI changes or additions. This could be static screenshots or a loom screencast.

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have requested at least 1 review (If the PR is significant enough, use best judgement here)
• I have commented my code where relevant, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• If package-lock.json has changes, it was intentional.
• The base of this PR is master if hotfix, develop if not

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
regenerative-fi-ui	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 8, 2024 11:42pm

[fabianschu]

I believe this contains a lot of changes that are already included in develop. Can this be rebased or made clear otherwise which changes still need to be reviewed? @Another-DevX

[Another-DevX]

I believe this contains a lot of changes that are already included in develop. Can this be rebased or made clear otherwise which changes still need to be reviewed? @Another-DevX

I've rebased and merged with the develop branch. This PR contains many visual feedback issues and needs to be merged into the dev branch.

[fabianschu]

I suggest to next time not merge, but just rebase on develop and force push to the respective branch (Another dev/fix feedback issues). This makes the PR a lot cleaner. Otherwise, looks good to me. Feel free to merge 👍🏼