v0.14.0 Release Candidate

[mikeingold]

Changes

• Removes -DEV suffix from version number
• Adds tests to complete code coverage
  • jacobian(::BezierCurve, ts) where t is outside domain [0,1] should throw error
  • integral(f, geometry) where paramdim(geometry)>3 is (currently) broken
• Change integrand function from Bézier test set to remove deprecation warnings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d784136) to head (3e74f57).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #93      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   90.50%   100.00%   +9.49%     
===========================================
  Files          16        17       +1     
  Lines         316       269      -47     
===========================================
- Hits          286       269      -17     
+ Misses         30         0      -30     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mikeingold]

Thanks for the bugfix!

I'm working out some issues with my local dev environment. Ever since we moved to TestItems I've been getting an opaque error message when trying to run tests from VS Code

An error occurred attempting to run tests: Error: Pending response rejected since connection got disposed

It's probably just something to do with my Julia environment within Code, not particular to TestItems (I was previously running tests locally but directly from a terminal), but I've had to luck finding solutions online so far.

[JoshuaLampert]

Hm ok, I don't know about this error. Did you try to run the tests locally from a terminal via ]test? If yes, does that work?

[JoshuaLampert]

Looks like julia-vscode/julia-vscode#3633?

[mikeingold]

Looks like julia-vscode/julia-vscode#3633?

Should we not have a compat section in the test Project? I’m looking around other major projects and it looks like most only have deps specified.

[JoshuaLampert]

Yes, indeed we should. Good point. I didn't realize that before,

[JoshuaLampert]

Wait...but we have?

[JoshuaLampert]

Ahh you mean, we should not have one? I think we should have one. So IMO it's fine as it is.

[mikeingold]

I’m not sure what the “right” answer is, just noticed that the Issue you linked seemed to point to that as a proximate cause, and then I took a quick look around and noticed other major packages without a [compat] section in their test/Project.toml.

I’m on mobile right now, so not able to thoroughly research it and I don’t see any contra-indications anywhere about it. If it’s just a bug I can workaround by switching my default Julia to 1.11-rc