Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

texmath: correct license #67229

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2020
Merged

Conversation

carlocab
Copy link
Member

See https://github.com/jgm/texmath/search?q=license, #67169


  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot added the haskell Haskell use is a significant feature of the PR or issue label Dec 19, 2020
@carlocab
Copy link
Member Author

@chenrui333 fixed the license. Maybe this doesn't need a full CI run.

@chenrui333 chenrui333 added CI-syntax-only Change only affects brew syntax, not the install. Only run syntax CI. license License PRs labels Dec 19, 2020
@chenrui333
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@chenrui333 chenrui333 merged commit 6adc3cd into Homebrew:master Dec 19, 2020
@carlocab carlocab deleted the texmath-license branch December 19, 2020 02:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI-syntax-only Change only affects brew syntax, not the install. Only run syntax CI. haskell Haskell use is a significant feature of the PR or issue license License PRs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants