-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cjdns 22.1 #203576
cjdns 22.1 #203576
Conversation
Hey I noticed that you guys were keeping this up to date without me. I specifically want to say thank you to @ZhongRuoyu and @chenrui333 and whoever else has helped out with this. I'll be at FOSDEM so hope to see you there ! |
Remove no-longer-needed workarounds Add cjdnstool binary which is now part of cjdns
1f11403
to
a82dec7
Compare
Thanks for the contribution! Just amended the commit message to match the expected style. |
Thank you, I tried to follow it but I guess I had one too many newlines. |
Shortened PR title, moved extra description from PR title to PR body |
🤖 An automated task has requested bottles to be published to this PR. |
HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>
(after doingHOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>
)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>
?remove workarounds which should be no longer necessary, add cjdnstool