Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.736 to 2.2.737

[dependabot]

Bumps guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.736 to 2.2.737.

Release notes

Sourced from guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2's releases.

Release v2.2.737

Release 2.2.737 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

• Bump eslint from 8.57.1 to 9.19.0 by @​dependabot in guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2#349

Full Changelog: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.736...v2.2.737

Commits

• 0ca546e Bump eslint from 8.57.1 to 9.19.0 (#349)
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Summary by Sourcery

Build:

• Update the guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 GitHub action from v2.2.736 to v2.2.737.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Bump Guibranco's GitHub file reader action from version 2.2.736 to 2.2.737 in the infisical-secrets-check.yml workflow file.

Why are these changes being made?

This update ensures compatibility with recent changes or improvements provided in the newer version of the GitHub action, potentially resolving any existing issues or enhancing functionality, thereby maintaining the health and efficiency of the workflow.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

[dependabot]

The following labels could not be found: github-actions, dependencies.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

[korbit-ai]

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request bumps the guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 action from version 2.2.736 to 2.2.737. This is a dependency update, and the changes primarily involve updating the action version in the workflow file.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Bumped the version of the guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 action.	Updated the action version from 2.2.736 to 2.2.737 in the 'Read secrets-result.log' step. Updated the action version from 2.2.736 to 2.2.737 in the 'Read secrets-result.md' step.	.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].}}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, dependabot[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[guibranco]

Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]

[instapr]

Reviewed changes, everything looks good!

🚀 PR approved for merging.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 66148aa..332b330. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C#	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	C#
Branch Coverage	100%	100%
Composite Coverage	100%	100%
Line Coverage	100%	100%

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[guibranco]

@dependabot squash and merge

[codara-ai-code-review]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.

1. Workflow Dependency on Specific Action Version
   /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - The use of a specific patch version (v2.2.737) for guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 could introduce instability if this version has breaking changes or bugs not present in the previous version. Consider specifying a more stable version like a minor version (e.g., v2.2) or using the latest stable release instead.

2. Lack of Version Locking Information
   /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - If the guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 library has updates, there is no record within the repository of what changes exist between the versions 2.2.736 and 2.2.737 that could affect the behavior. It's generally good practice to include a comment or documentation regarding the reason for version upgrades in workflows to help future maintainers understand why the change was made.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.

1. Conditional Execution Improvement
   /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Instead of if: always() and if: failure(), consider using a clearer, more explicit logic for error handling. You could document the purpose of each condition (if: always() for ensuring that the log is read regardless of the job's success, and if: failure() to indicate that the report is only read on failure). This will improve code readability and maintainability.

2. Refactor Redundant Usage of Action
   /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Since both steps use the same action but with different conditions, you could consolidate or document the reasons for this redundancy to enhance maintainability and clarify the logic for future developers. Documenting the flow of dependencies between these steps could be beneficial for understanding the workflow progression.

3. Commenting and Documentation
   /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Consider adding comments above each job or step to provide context for their existence and function. This will aid future developers in understanding the modifications' purpose and the workflow's overall design.

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:06AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:06AM INF 73 commits scanned.
12:06AM INF scan completed in 68.3ms
12:06AM INF no leaks found

[dependabot]

This PR has already been merged! 🎉