Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml #273
Conversation
|
Review changes with |
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diff
Identified IssuesNo issues were identified in the incoming changes as the file was simply deleted, and there are no new additions or modifications to evaluate. Missing TestsSince the proposed change is a deletion of a file, there are no new features or modifications that require additional tests. Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request removes the snorkell-auto-documentation.yml workflow file. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.
|
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
|
I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan. |
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
Feedback:
Overall, this PR looks good to merge. Great job! 👍 |
github-actions
bot
added
the
size/S
WalkthroughThe pull request involves the removal of a GitHub Actions workflow file named Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please clean up the PR description by removing the automated note at the bottom and reviewing the checkbox section to ensure it accurately reflects the changes being made. Removing a workflow file typically doesn't require documentation updates.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs1:36PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:36PM INF 268 commits scanned.
1:36PM INF scan completed in 977ms
1:36PM INF no leaks found
|
|
|
I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan. |
📑 Description
Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
Summary by CodeRabbit