Update initial-setup.ps1 #64
Conversation
|
Review changes with |
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR updates the initial setup script to fix a string replacement pattern in the README.md file. The change modifies how the template project name is replaced during initialization. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Feedback
📑 Description
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional InformationNo additional information provided. |
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diff
Identified Issues
Issue 1: Consistent naming convention for placeholders in the scriptExplanationIn the script Suggested Code FixEnsure that all placeholder names follow a consistent naming convention. If "POC Template" is the intended placeholder, verify that all other instances in the script are updated accordingly. # Ensure consistent placeholder usage
(Get-Content README.md) | ForEach-Object {$_ -replace "POC Template", $POCNameReadable} | Set-Content README.md
(Get-Content .wakatime-project) | ForEach-Object {$_ -replace "POC .NET Template", "$POCNameReadable"} | Set-Content .wakatime-project
(Get-Content _config.yml) | ForEach-Object {$_ -replace "POC Template", $POCNameReadable} | Set-Content _config.ymlExplanation of the FixThe fix involves ensuring that the placeholder "POC Template" is used consistently across all relevant files. This avoids potential issues where some instances might not be replaced correctly due to inconsistent naming. Missing TestsGiven that the change involves a string replacement in a script, the primary test would be to execute the script and verify that all instances of "POC Template" are correctly replaced with the value of Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.
These suggestions aim to enhance the code's reliability, maintainability, and clarity, ensuring it behaves as expected. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
size/XS
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
Code Coverage Report
|
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please fill out the PR description with details about what issue this change fixes and whether it could impact existing setups. The template is there for a reason - it helps others understand and review your changes.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs10:37AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:37AM INF 48 commits scanned.
10:37AM INF scan completed in 65.5ms
10:37AM INF no leaks found
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| initial-setup.ps1 | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
|
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Summary by Sourcery
Enhancements:
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Update the
initial-setup.ps1script to replace the string "POC Template" with the$POCNameReadablevariable in the README.md file setup process.Why are these changes being made?
The change ensures consistency in naming conventions by correctly replacing "POC Template" instead of "POCTemplate" in the README.md file, helping to reflect the intended naming format throughout the project setup. This addresses a potential oversight where the string was not matching the expected format, improving the overall setup script accuracy.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores