Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #25
Conversation
|
Review changes with |
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request updates the Infisical secrets check workflow to use the Sequence diagram: Updated Infisical secrets check workflowsequenceDiagram
participant PR as Pull Request
participant Action as GitHub Action
participant Infisical as Infisical Service
PR->>Action: Trigger workflow
Action->>Action: Checkout repository
Action->>Infisical: Scan for secrets
Infisical-->>Action: Return scan results
Action->>PR: Add comment with results
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe GitHub workflow for Infisical secrets checking has been revised to enhance efficiency. The previous manual installation steps for the Infisical CLI have been removed, replaced by a single step that utilizes the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.
|
In the .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml file, consider rephrasing the "permissions" section for clarity. Here's the updated block:
```yaml
permissions:
contents: read
pull_requests: write |
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diff
Identified Issues
Issue 1: Workflow PermissionsExplanationThe permissions set in the workflow ( Suggested Code FixReview the permissions required by permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: noneExplanation of the FixThis fix reduces the permissions granted to the workflow, aligning with the principle of least privilege. By setting Missing TestsSince this is a GitHub Actions workflow, traditional unit tests do not apply. However, you can test the changes by:
Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
|
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs1:36AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:36AM INF 29 commits scanned.
1:36AM INF scan completed in 74.4ms
1:36AM INF no leaks found
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please add a description explaining the motivation for switching to the GitHub action and any notable differences from the previous implementation.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Simplify the
infisical-secrets-check.ymlworkflow by consolidating multiple steps into a single action usingguibranco/[email protected].Why are these changes being made?
The new action streamlines the secrets scanning process, reducing complexity and redundancy in the workflow. This change enhances maintainability, efficiency, and clarity by replacing individual setup and execution steps with a comprehensive, encapsulated action.
Summary by CodeRabbit