-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bugfix/13 bug fix 7 maintainability issues in predicatetestsprogramcs #20
Bugfix/13 bug fix 7 maintainability issues in predicatetestsprogramcs #20
Conversation
Review changes with SemanticDiff. |
Hi there! π Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR |
It seems that there is no code provided for review. Please share the code differences that you would like me to analyze, and I'll be happy to provide feedback following the specified guidelines. |
π Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan. |
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diffSince there are no changes in the diff, there are no items to list under "Changes in the diff." Identified IssuesThere are no identified issues since there are no changes in the diff. Missing TestsSince there are no changes in the diff, there are no missing tests to generate. Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:
- We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.
- All of the files are larger than we can process. We're working on it!
Feedback
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a π or π on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
β
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions β Issue Categories
β
Category Enabled Naming β Database Operations β Documentation β Logging β Error Handling β Systems and Environment β Objects and Data Structures β Tests β Readability and Maintainability β Asynchronous Processing β Design Patterns β Third-Party Libraries β Performance β Security β Functionality β Feedback and Support
PR Code Suggestions β¨No code suggestions found for PR. |
Infisical secrets check: β No secrets leaked! Scan results:
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
This pull request is ready β for merge/squash. |
1 similar comment
This pull request is ready β for merge/squash. |
Closes #
π Description
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
βΉ Additional Information