Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024
Merged

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #15

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jun 21, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

👋 Hi there!

  1. Ensure proper command substitution within the tee command to process ANSI escape codes in secrets-result.log.
  2. Complete the last line **Infisical secrets ch... to maintain code integrity.
  3. Review and ensure consistency in punctuation and formatting of messages for failure and cancellation scenarios.

The description could be more helpful.


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - The sed command usage in the run step may lead to unintended behavior or failure if the command is not available in the environment where the GitHub Action runs.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - It's advisable to check for the availability of the sed command or provide a fallback option to handle cases where sed is not available. This ensures more robust and reliable behavior of the GitHub Action.

Copy link

@senior-dev-bot senior-dev-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback from Senior Dev Bot

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 27 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0772ae and c598a2f.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jun 21, 2024

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Summary of Incoming Changes

  • ✅ Corrected the log output to remove ANSI color codes using sed.
  • 🤪 Fixed a typo in the failure message by removing an extra period.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 🤪Typo Unnecessary period at the end of the failure message. 🟡Low 🟢High

Explanation of Identified Issues

  1. Typo:

    • Details: An extra period was present in the failure message.
    • File Path: .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
    • Lines: 64, 75

    Code with Issue:

    message-failure: |
      **Infisical secrets check:** :rotating_light: Secrets leaked!.     

    Proposed Fix:

    message-failure: |
      **Infisical secrets check:** :rotating_light: Secrets leaked!

    Explanation: The extra period at the end of the message was removed to correct the typo.

General Review

The incoming changes are minor but useful. The removal of ANSI color codes from the log output improves the readability of the log file. The typo fix in the failure message enhances the professionalism of the output. The code quality and style are generally good, with no significant issues found.

Yours, Gooroo.dev
I'd love a reaction or reply to know your thoughts.

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

11:14PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:14PM INF 21 commits scanned.
11:14PM INF scan completed in 69.6ms
11:14PM INF no leaks found

Copy link

@guibranco guibranco merged commit 59555fe into main Jun 21, 2024
10 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch June 21, 2024 23:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant