Delete .deepsource.toml

[guibranco]

📑 Description

Delete .deepsource.toml

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

---

Summary by Sourcery

Chores:

• Delete .deepsource.toml

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Removed DeepSource configuration file
  • Discontinued test coverage analysis configuration

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request removes the .deepsource.toml file.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Removed the DeepSource configuration file.	Deleted the .deepsource.toml file from the repository. This change will disable DeepSource analysis for the project going forward. Any configurations set in .deepsource.toml will no longer be active	.deepsource.toml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[codara-ai-code-review]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. Loss of Analysis Configuration:
   • .deepsource.toml is being deleted entirely, which removes any configuration for static analysis, including the test-coverage analyzer. This could lead to a lack of oversight on code quality and test coverage metrics, potentially allowing issues to go undetected in future code changes.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. Keep Configuration Files:
   • Instead of deleting the .deepsource.toml file, consider maintaining it, especially if you rely on DeepSource for managing code quality. If the configuration is no longer relevant, update it instead of removing it entirely to avoid losing analysis capabilities.

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].}}

[korbit-ai]

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

[gooroo-dev]

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

• ➖ Removed the .deepsource.toml configuration file, which included settings for the "test-coverage" analyzer.

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the incoming changes as the diff simply involves the deletion of a configuration file without introducing any new code or logic.

Explanation of Identified Issues

There are no identified issues to explain or address since the change is a straightforward deletion of a file.

Missing Tests

Since the change involves the removal of a configuration file and does not introduce any new functionality or code, there are no missing tests to generate.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
I'd love to hear from you! React or reply.

[instapr]

📑 Comment

The deletion of .deepsource.toml looks good. Make sure to validate that the build pipeline still runs successfully after this change.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the removal of the .deepsource.toml configuration file, which previously defined settings for the DeepSource code analysis tool, specifically for test coverage analysis. By deleting this file, the project no longer has an explicit configuration for tracking test coverage through DeepSource.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.deepsource.toml	Removed configuration file for DeepSource test coverage analyzer

Poem

🐰 A config file hops away,
DeepSource settings in disarray
Test coverage config now gone
No more metrics to dwell upon
A rabbit's code leaps free today! 🌟

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 080e81f and ba067bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .deepsource.toml (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• .deepsource.toml

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
• GitHub Check: secrets-scan
• GitHub Check: test-vpn

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[korbit-ai]

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

• You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
• You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
• Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
• Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
• Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

• Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
• Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings

​

Setting	Value
Review Schedule	Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count	10
Automatic PR Descriptions	✅

Issue Categories

​

Category	Enabled
Naming	✅
Database Operations	✅
Documentation	✅
Logging	✅
Error Handling	✅
Systems and Environment	✅
Objects and Data Structures	✅
Readability and Maintainability	✅
Asynchronous Processing	✅
Design Patterns	✅
Third-Party Libraries	✅
Performance	✅
Security	✅
Functionality	✅

Feedback and Support

• Tell us what you think of Korbit
• Schedule a call with our team
• Email us @ [email protected]

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• The PR indicates documentation changes are needed and were made, but no documentation updates are included in this PR. Please add any necessary documentation changes.
• Please provide justification for removing the DeepSource configuration. Are we moving to a different static analysis tool, or discontinuing use of static analysis? This context is important for reviewing the change.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

9:40PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
9:40PM INF 53 commits scanned.
9:40PM INF scan completed in 63.5ms
9:40PM INF no leaks found

[korbit-ai]

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.