Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.705 to 2.2.706

[dependabot]

Bumps guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.705 to 2.2.706.

Release notes

Sourced from guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2's releases.

Release v2.2.706

Release 2.2.706 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

• Bump @​types/node from 22.8.1 to 22.8.7 by @​dependabot in guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2#308

Full Changelog: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.705...v2.2.706

Commits

• 04b6c16 Bump @​types/node from 22.8.1 to 22.8.7 (#308)
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Summary by Sourcery

Build:

• Update the version of guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.705 to 2.2.706 in the GitHub Actions workflow.

[dependabot]

The following labels could not be found: github-actions, dependencies.

[korbit-ai]

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

[gooroo-dev]

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

• 🛠️ Updated the version of guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.705 to 2.2.706 in two places within the GitHub Actions workflow file.

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the incoming changes. The update is a straightforward version bump with no apparent issues in the context provided.

Missing Tests

Since the change is a version update for a GitHub Action, it does not involve direct code logic that would require additional tests. However, it is advisable to ensure that the workflow runs successfully with the updated version to confirm compatibility and functionality.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
Add a reaction or reply to share your thoughts!

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This is a minor version bump of the github-file-reader-action-v2 GitHub Action from v2.2.705 to v2.2.706. The update includes a dependency update of @types/node from 22.8.1 to 22.8.7.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated GitHub Action version in workflow file	Updated github-file-reader-action-v2 from v2.2.705 to v2.2.706 for reading secrets-result.log Updated github-file-reader-action-v2 from v2.2.705 to v2.2.706 for reading secrets-result.md	.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].}}

[instapr]

Feedback

The dependency guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 has been successfully updated from version 2.2.705 to 2.2.706 in the .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml file.

This PR looks good to merge. 🚀

Please proceed with merging this change once the necessary checks pass. Thank you! 🙌

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codara-ai-code-review]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. Version Inconsistency:
   • .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - The workflow uses guibranco/[email protected], which is a minor version change from v2.2.705. If there are breaking changes or bugs introduced in the newer version, this could cause unexpected workflow failures without a proper check of the release notes. Ensure you review the changelog for the new version to ascertain compatibility.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. Consistent Error Handling:

   • .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Since the log step uses if: always() but the report step uses if: failure(), you might want to think about making it clearer what triggers the reading of these logs. Consider adding more explicit error-handling logic or comments to describe the intended behavior of these conditional checks, ensuring that observers can easily follow the flow of events and their significance.

2. Use of Latest Action:

   • .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - It would be beneficial to regularly update actions and pin to a more general tag, such as v2, if compatibility is maintained and updates are tested accordingly to ensure that you benefit from all fixes and features without explicitly managing patch versions.

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, dependabot[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[guibranco]

Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]

[guibranco]

@dependabot squash and merge

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

9:10PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
9:10PM INF 43 commits scanned.
9:10PM INF scan completed in 63.6ms
9:10PM INF no leaks found

[dependabot]

One of your CI runs failed on this pull request, so Dependabot won't merge it.

Dependabot will still automatically merge this pull request if you amend it and your tests pass.

[guibranco]

@gstraccini codacy bypass

[gstraccini]

Bypassing the Codacy analysis for this pull request! ⚠️