Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump the lmdb Python bindings to 1.6.2 to gain support for Python 3.13 #2179

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

sauclovian-g
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #2178.

@sauclovian-g sauclovian-g added the PR: dependency bump Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jan 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@RyanGlScott RyanGlScott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM assuming that CI passes. My educated guess is that the upgrade from lock-version 2.0 to 2.1 shouldn't impact much, as (I think) the groups just make it more obvious whether a dependency is installed by default ("main") or only when development dependencies are installed ("dev").

@sauclovian-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

The thing I'd worry about is that it makes the lock file incompatible with someone else's older version of poetry that they'll then have to update. Hopefully this isn't a huge problem.

@sauclovian-g sauclovian-g merged commit b2e301a into master Jan 14, 2025
34 checks passed
@sauclovian-g sauclovian-g deleted the 2178-bump-lmdb branch January 14, 2025 22:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: dependency bump Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Python bindings fail with python 3.13
2 participants