Fix typo in reviews.md (#989)

Humiliary is not a word.

docs/explanations/reviews.md

@@ -51,6 +51,6 @@ New members should be regular contributors to dodal and should have been "shadow
 - Adherence to the review standards above as well as the [repository standards](../reference/standards.rst) and [device standards](../reference/device-standards.rst).
 - Independent (i.e. not just to satisfy a reviewer) motivation to make sure all code in dodal is well-tested. Use of unit and system tests as appropriate. Clear effort made to keep test coverage high (>90%). 
 - Advanced understanding of bluesky and ophyd-async including concepts and best practices, such as how to appropriately split logic between devices/plans/callbacks.
-- Humility in the use of reviewing as a tool in a way that balances the need to preserve quality with the need for progress. Appropriate use of the Must/Should/Could/Nit system documented above is helpful in showing this, as it gives the reviewer the opportunity to weight their comments in terms of project impact. They should also demonstrate similar humiliary as a reviewee.
+- Humility in the use of reviewing as a tool in a way that balances the need to preserve quality with the need for progress. Appropriate use of the Must/Should/Could/Nit system documented above is helpful in showing this, as it gives the reviewer the opportunity to weight their comments in terms of project impact. They should also demonstrate similar humility as a reviewee.
 
 Additionally, they should be regularly raising issues in the repository and demonstrating the ability to write well formed issues, with well defined acceptance criteria, that are understandable without large amounts of context.