-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(llmobs): encode llm objects in utf-8 before sending [backport #11961 to 2.19] #12033
Merged
+25
−16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Yun-Kim
force-pushed
the
yunkim/backport-11961-to-219
branch
from
January 22, 2025 17:26
7466bf9
to
00670ef
Compare
lievan
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2025
This PR resolves an issue in the Python SDK where non-ascii/utf8 characters being annotated on spans resulted in span payloads being dropped due to encoding errors. In #11330 we previously added the `ensure_ascii=False` option to our `safe_json()` helper's use of `json.dumps(...)` in order to keep non-ascii characters from being encoded multiple times into nonsense (as we were calling `safe_json()` multiple nested times while building the span event from the span tags. However this resulted in issues where non-latin1 characters (which is a subset of utf-8 and apparently the encoding scheme HTTP library relies on, which we in turn rely on to submit payloads) broke the encoding at payload submission time. To fix this, we remove the `ensure_ascii=False` option at the final write time. Also note that after #11543 we mostly centralized all of the times a span event is encoded, which is at write time and when encoding the span's input/output value fields (which can be a json dictionary format). Since we need to provide valid json formatting for the IO fields (which leads to a prettier UI display), we still need to call `json.dumps(ensure_ascii=False)` to avoid the same problem as fixed by end (i.e. write time) This PR also adds minor test fixtures mocking out the LLMObs back end intake to make assertions on the payloads we should be submitting to LLMObs, since previous tests were all relying on the span events prior to encoding/submission and weren't able to cover this scenario. - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) - [ ] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Co-authored-by: Kyle Verhoog <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yun Kim <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yun Kim <[email protected]>
Yun-Kim
force-pushed
the
yunkim/backport-11961-to-219
branch
from
January 22, 2025 17:33
00670ef
to
b1eb5f7
Compare
Kyle-Verhoog
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2025
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2025-01-22 18:17:53 Comparing candidate commit b1eb5f7 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 394 metrics, 2 unstable metrics. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backports #11961 to 2.19.
Note that due to non-existent test files/conftest utilities in the 2.19 branch, this backport avoids backporting over the entire diff of #11961 and instead just backports over the fix implementation.
This PR resolves an issue in the Python SDK where non-ascii/utf8 characters being annotated on spans resulted in span payloads being dropped due to encoding errors.
In #11330 we previously added the
ensure_ascii=False
option to oursafe_json()
helper's use ofjson.dumps(...)
in order to keep non-ascii characters from being encoded multiple times into nonsense (as we were callingsafe_json()
multiple nested times while building the span event from the span tags. However this resulted in issues where non-latin1 characters (which is a subset of utf-8 and apparently the encoding scheme HTTP library relies on, which we in turn rely on to submit payloads) broke the encoding at payload submission time.To fix this, we remove the
ensure_ascii=False
option at the final write time.Also note that after #11543 we mostly centralized all of the times a span event is encoded, which is at write time and when encoding the span's input/output value fields (which can be a json dictionary format). Since we need to provide valid json formatting for the IO fields (which leads to a prettier UI display), we still need to call
json.dumps(ensure_ascii=False)
to avoid the same problem as fixed by end (i.e. write time)This PR also adds minor test fixtures mocking out the LLMObs back end intake to make assertions on the payloads we should be submitting to LLMObs, since previous tests were all relying on the span events prior to encoding/submission and weren't able to cover this scenario.
Checklist
Reviewer Checklist