Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[otel-agent] log level: case insensitivity to set the log level #32619

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

truthbk
Copy link
Member

@truthbk truthbk commented Jan 2, 2025

What does this PR do?

Makes sure we can properly resolve uppercase log levels.

Motivation

Buggy behavior currently, due to us being unable to map uppercase levels correctly.

Describe how you validated your changes

Set DD_LOG_LEVEL or log_level to a valid log level using upper case and make sure the otel-agent runs correctly and in the expected loglevel.

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@truthbk truthbk requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2025 16:36
@truthbk truthbk requested a review from ankitpatel96 January 2, 2025 16:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added team/opentelemetry OpenTelemetry team short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Jan 2, 2025
@songy23 songy23 removed the request for review from ankitpatel96 January 2, 2025 16:39
@truthbk
Copy link
Member Author

truthbk commented Jan 3, 2025

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2025-01-03 08:48:28 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2025-01-03 12:48:30 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

[email protected] unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@truthbk truthbk added this to the 7.61.0 milestone Jan 3, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 1af8863cd8cd775bae45659422a477d619468336

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 940.30MB 940.29MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 949.60MB 949.59MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 79.00MB 79.00MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 79.08MB 79.08MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 79.08MB 79.08MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 56.10MB 56.10MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 506.09MB 506.09MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.76MB 113.76MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.83MB 113.83MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.83MB 113.83MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 109.21MB 109.21MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 109.28MB 109.28MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -0.01MB 1197.91MB 1197.92MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.01MB 1207.23MB 1207.23MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -0.01MB 1207.23MB 1207.23MB 140.00MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=52085941 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 1143f63

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: bb0e8815-ba89-4aae-b392-67e872a0bfaa

Baseline: 1af8863
Comparison: 1143f63
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +1.17 [+1.10, +1.24] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.82 [-2.46, +4.10] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.35 [+0.27, +0.43] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.28 [-0.50, +1.05] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.23 [-0.44, +0.91] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.10 [+0.07, +0.13] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.09 [-0.70, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.91, +0.94] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.02 [-0.84, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.00 [-0.97, +0.97] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.13, +0.13] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.67, +0.61] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.25 [-0.71, +0.22] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.48 [-0.60, -0.35] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.52 [-1.31, +0.28] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 8/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

if !ok {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid log level (%v) set in the OTel Telemetry configuration", telemetryLogLevel.String())
}
if telemetryLogMapping < activeLogLevel {
activeLogLevel = telemetryLogMapping
}
fmt.Printf("setting log level to: %v\n", logLevelReverseMap[activeLogLevel])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is useful to keep, previously it took us some time to figure out the log level wasn't respected

@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Jan 5, 2025
@liustanley liustanley added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Jan 6, 2025
@liustanley
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2025-01-06 19:06:51 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 35m.


2025-01-06 19:40:10 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 530f3b3 into main Jan 6, 2025
241 of 242 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the jaime/otelloglevel branch January 6, 2025 19:40
@github-actions github-actions bot modified the milestones: 7.61.0, 7.63.0 Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/opentelemetry OpenTelemetry team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants