Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Force the configsync component to be instantiated by FX when used #32609

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

hush-hush
Copy link
Member

@hush-hush hush-hush commented Jan 2, 2025

What does this PR do?

configSync is a component with no public method, therefore nobody depends on it and FX only instantiates components when
they're needed. Adding a dummy function that takes our Component as a parameter force the instantiation of configsync.
This means that simply using configsync.Module will run our component (which is the expected behavior).

This prevent silent corner case where including configsync in the main function would not actually instantiate it.

Describe how you validated your changes

This test is validated by the CI

@hush-hush hush-hush requested review from a team as code owners January 2, 2025 12:12
@hush-hush hush-hush requested a review from jeremy-hanna January 2, 2025 12:12
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=52357680 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit c5c186a

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 1db9791d43f37fa0ad49b51d7b5555a64f992a6f

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 940.78MB 940.78MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 950.08MB 950.07MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 1011.42MB 1011.42MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 1020.73MB 1020.73MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 1020.73MB 1020.73MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 58.62MB 58.62MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 58.70MB 58.70MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 58.70MB 58.70MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 56.13MB 56.13MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 506.16MB 506.16MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.81MB 113.81MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 109.25MB 109.25MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 109.32MB 109.32MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.00MB 113.88MB 113.88MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse -0.00MB 113.88MB 113.88MB 10.00MB

Decision

✅ Passed

Base automatically changed from maxime/add-retry-to-configsync to main January 2, 2025 14:49
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot requested review from a team as code owners January 2, 2025 14:49
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot requested a review from IbraheemA January 2, 2025 14:49
@hush-hush hush-hush force-pushed the maxime/make-configsync-force-include-itself branch from d569446 to c2a5246 Compare January 2, 2025 16:22
@hush-hush hush-hush removed request for a team and IbraheemA January 2, 2025 16:22
@github-actions github-actions bot added team/agent-security medium review PR review might take time labels Jan 2, 2025
@hush-hush hush-hush force-pushed the maxime/make-configsync-force-include-itself branch from c2a5246 to f709c0e Compare January 2, 2025 16:24
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 501b8856-fa31-4698-a564-e569d35be090

Baseline: ed913b5
Comparison: f709c0e
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +4.96 [+1.59, +8.34] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +2.74 [+2.59, +2.90] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.30 [+0.22, +0.39] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.27 [-0.38, +0.92] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.18 [-0.60, +0.95] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.12 [-0.35, +0.59] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.80, +0.89] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.02 [-0.80, +0.84] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.75, +0.72] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.02 [-0.13, +0.09] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.03 [-0.82, +0.76] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.07 [-0.86, +0.73] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.08 [-0.20, +0.04] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.21 [-0.24, -0.17] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -1.15 [-1.82, -0.47] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@hush-hush hush-hush added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Jan 3, 2025
kkhor-datadog
kkhor-datadog previously approved these changes Jan 7, 2025
@kkhor-datadog kkhor-datadog dismissed their stale review January 7, 2025 15:28

failing E2E tests

Copy link
Contributor

@jeremy-hanna jeremy-hanna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for ASC

@hush-hush hush-hush force-pushed the maxime/make-configsync-force-include-itself branch from f709c0e to c5c186a Compare January 7, 2025 17:24
@hush-hush
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2025-01-09 10:25:47 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 35m.


2025-01-09 10:59:01 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 9e63bbd into main Jan 9, 2025
232 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the maxime/make-configsync-force-include-itself branch January 9, 2025 10:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.63.0 milestone Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants