Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix martor dark style #2374

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 25, 2024
Merged

Fix martor dark style #2374

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 25, 2024

Conversation

int-y1
Copy link
Contributor

@int-y1 int-y1 commented Dec 25, 2024

part of #2035

  • on the main site, martor preview follows light/dark mode (main site includes style.scss, and style.scss has light/dark martor)
  • on the admin site, martor always uses light mode (see AdminMartorWidget for code)

Screenshot 2024-12-25 032526

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 47.67%. Comparing base (fd7fb05) to head (7a7c274).
Report is 39 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2374      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   46.76%   47.67%   +0.91%     
==========================================
  Files         251      253       +2     
  Lines       13317    13648     +331     
==========================================
+ Hits         6228     6507     +279     
- Misses       7089     7141      +52     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@quantum5 quantum5 added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into DMOJ:master with commit 4a34ad3 Dec 25, 2024
3 checks passed
@int-y1 int-y1 deleted the martor-dark branch December 25, 2024 08:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants