Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SPIKE - code coverage #349

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

SPIKE - code coverage #349

merged 20 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

fzhao99
Copy link
Collaborator

@fzhao99 fzhao99 commented Feb 6, 2025

PULL REQUEST

Summary

Proof of concept for our code coverage SPIKE

Related Issue

Fixes #314

Checklist

  • Descriptive Pull Request title
  • Link to relevant issues
  • Provide necessary context for design reviewers
  • Update documentation

@fzhao99 fzhao99 changed the title Bob/code coverage spike poc SPIKE - code coverage Feb 6, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Coverage report for ./query-connector

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔴 Statements 50.2% 868/1729
🔴 Branches 48.37% 253/523
🔴 Functions 47.79% 173/362
🔴 Lines 50.25% 815/1622

Test suite run success

70 tests passing in 9 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 1922dbc

Copy link
Member

@nickclyde nickclyde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, great work on this Bob!

@fzhao99 fzhao99 marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 20:48
@nickclyde nickclyde merged commit a87b5ad into main Feb 6, 2025
12 checks passed
@nickclyde nickclyde deleted the bob/code-coverage-spike-poc branch February 6, 2025 22:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SPIKE - Research a code coverage metric
2 participants