Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SinecSecurityGuard_tb_reviewed #10828

Merged
merged 39 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor

@XiFneg XiFneg commented Jul 17, 2024

Required items, please complete

Change(s):

  • See guidance below

Reason for Change(s):

  • See guidance below

Version Updated:

  • Required only for Detections/Analytic Rule templates
  • See guidance below

Testing Completed:

  • See guidance below

Checked that the validations are passing and have addressed any issues that are present:

  • See guidance below

Guidance <- remove section before submitting


Before submitting this PR please ensure that you have read the following sections and filled out the changes, reason for change and testing complete sections:

Thank you for your contribution to the Microsoft Sentinel Github repo.

Details of the code changes in your submitted PR. Providing descriptions for pull requests ensures there is context to changes being made and greatly enhances the code review process. Providing associated Issues that this resolves also easily connects the reason.

Change(s):

  • Updated syntax for XYZ.yaml

Reason for Change(s):

Version updated:

  • Yes
  • Detections/Analytic Rule templates are required to have the version updated

The code should have been tested in a Microsoft Sentinel environment that does not have any custom parsers, functions or tables, so that you validate no incorrect syntax and execution functions properly. If your submission requires a custom parser or function, it must be submitted with the PR.

Testing Completed:

  • Yes/No/Need Help

Note: If updating a detection, you must update the version field.

Before the submission has been made, please look at running the KQL and Yaml Validation Checks locally.
https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel#run-kql-validation-locally

Checked that the validations are passing and have addressed any issues that are present:

  • Yes/No/Need Help

Note: Let us know if you have tried fixing the validation error and need help.

References:


@XiFneg XiFneg requested review from a team as code owners July 17, 2024 03:20
@v-atulyadav v-atulyadav added the Solution Solution specialty review needed label Jul 17, 2024
@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Jul 17, 2024 via email

@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Jul 17, 2024

why "kqlValidations" always return "Template in is not valid" as below pic:
image
I generate the UUID via python script:

import uuid
new_uuid = uuid.uuid4()  # Generates a random UUID.
print(new_uuid)

@v-prasadboke
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @XiFneg, Solution is missing with input file which is required to package the solution. Please create one.

https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel/blob/master/Solutions/Armis/Data/Solution_Armis.json

You can refer this input file for more clarification.

Also I've committed some required changes.

Thanks,
Prasad

@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Jul 19, 2024

Hello @XiFneg, Solution is missing with input file which is required to package the solution. Please create one.

https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel/blob/master/Solutions/Armis/Data/Solution_Armis.json

You can refer this input file for more clarification.

Also I've committed some required changes.

Thanks, Prasad

Thank you, it looks the pipeline check-ups all passed, what should we do next please?

@v-prasadboke
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @XiFneg, Just wanted confirm the Data connector added to the solution is it of type CCP

@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Jul 31, 2024 via email

},
"support": {
"name": "Siemens AG",
"email": "Siemens AG",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please correct email address

@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Aug 5, 2024 via email

"domains" : ["cybersecurity", "Cloud-based"],
"verticals": ["Industrial","OT","Shop Floors"]
"domains" : ["Security - Network"],
"verticals": ["NDR"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Aug 7, 2024 via email

@v-prasadboke
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @XiFneg, I have added missing permissions can you please check once.

@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Aug 13, 2024 via email

@v-prasadboke
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, everything is ok except the logo part is blank when testing UI, would this be figured out after the solution's released? From: v-prasadboke @.> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 9:27 PM To: Azure/Azure-Sentinel @.> Cc: Liu, Xi Feng (T CST SAR-CN) @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [Azure/Azure-Sentinel] SinecSecurityGuard_tb_reviewed (PR #10828) Hello @XiFneghttps://github.com/XiFneg, I have added missing permissions can you please check once. - Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#10828 (comment)>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWGLDN2MSLDBOVJM4LHX27LZRCZZTAVCNFSM6AAAAABK7X3XP2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOBTHE4TGMJQGU. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

yes @XiFneg, That is because the url is pointing to master
And the logo is not in master branch yet

@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Aug 15, 2024 via email

@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Aug 19, 2024 via email

@v-prasadboke
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @XiFneg, Let this PR get merged than you can publish your solution on Marketplace

@v-atulyadav v-atulyadav merged commit 066c288 into Azure:master Aug 20, 2024
35 checks passed
@XiFneg
Copy link
Contributor Author

XiFneg commented Nov 18, 2024

@v-prasadboke Is the Zip file for 3.0.0 still the lastest one? Or should there be a 3.0.1 file? thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Solution Solution specialty review needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants