Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MU WPCOM: Filter out the full-site-editing plugin from the active_plugins list if the plugin file doesn't exist (2nd try) #41887

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

arthur791004
Copy link
Contributor

@arthur791004 arthur791004 commented Feb 19, 2025

Related to p1737694462032909/1737565339.870709-slack-CRWCHQGUB, 169775-ghe-Automattic/wpcom

Proposed changes:

UPDATE

This is the 2nd try and the previous one, #41841, has been reverted by #41886 because of the error below. See p1739932956773779-slack-C4N88L95W

Uncaught TypeError: array_search(): Argument #2 ($haystack) must be of type array, string given

It should be fixed by c7e93ce. But, weirdly, I cannot reproduce this issue on my wpcom site as it gets an array instead of empty string 🫠


  • The plugin full-site-editing was removed using the task API with the CLI command below. However, this caused an issue where the plugin is still listed in the active_plugins option. Therefore, this PR filters it out from active_plugins if the plugin file has already been removed.
    wp --skip-plugins --skip-themes plugin delete full-site-editing

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

  • Go to your atomic site
  • Install WordPress.com Editing Toolkit
  • Run the following command to remove the plugin:
    wp --skip-plugins --skip-themes plugin delete full-site-editing
  • Run the following command to check whether the full-site-editing plugin is still listed in the active_plugins option
    wp option get active_plugins
  • Apply changes to your atomic site
  • Run the above command again and the full-site-editing plugin should not be listed in the active_plugins option

@arthur791004 arthur791004 self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
@arthur791004 arthur791004 added the [Type] Bug When a feature is broken and / or not performing as intended label Feb 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
    • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
      • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
      • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
    • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
      • For significant changes to core functionality.
      • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
    • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
      • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
      • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
  3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!


Mu Wpcom plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: WordPress.com Simple releases happen semi-continuously (PCYsg-Jjm-p2).

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.


Wpcomsh plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: Atomic deploys happen twice daily on weekdays (p9o2xV-2EN-p2).

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! label Feb 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WordPress.com Simple site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin, and enable the feat/remove-fse-from-active-plugins branch.

    • For jetpack-mu-wpcom changes, also add define( 'JETPACK_MU_WPCOM_LOAD_VIA_BETA_PLUGIN', true ); to your wp-config.php file.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:

    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin feat/remove-fse-from-active-plugins
    

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

@arthur791004 arthur791004 added [Status] Needs Team Review and removed [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! labels Feb 19, 2025
Copy link

jp-launch-control bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Code Coverage Summary

Coverage changed in 1 file.

File Coverage Δ% Δ Uncovered
projects/packages/jetpack-mu-wpcom/src/class-jetpack-mu-wpcom.php 0/223 (0.00%) 0.00% 1 ❤️‍🩹

1 file is newly checked for coverage.

File Coverage
projects/packages/jetpack-mu-wpcom/src/features/wpcom-fse/wpcom-fse.php 0/11 (0.00%) 💔

Full summary · PHP report · JS report

Coverage check overridden by I don't care about code coverage for this PR Use this label to ignore the check for insufficient code coveage. .

@arthur791004 arthur791004 added the I don't care about code coverage for this PR Use this label to ignore the check for insufficient code coveage. label Feb 19, 2025
@arthur791004 arthur791004 requested a review from a team February 19, 2025 03:55
Copy link
Contributor

@taipeicoder taipeicoder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@arthur791004
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested the following code to see whether it works if the value is a string. Now it works successfully.

apply_filters('option_active_plugins', '');

@arthur791004 arthur791004 merged commit 6f259ea into trunk Feb 20, 2025
72 of 73 checks passed
@arthur791004 arthur791004 deleted the feat/remove-fse-from-active-plugins branch February 20, 2025 01:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I don't care about code coverage for this PR Use this label to ignore the check for insufficient code coveage. [mu wpcom Feature] Wpcom Fse [Package] Jetpack mu wpcom WordPress.com Features [Plugin] mu wpcom jetpack-mu-wpcom plugin [Plugin] Wpcomsh [Type] Bug When a feature is broken and / or not performing as intended
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants