Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: enhancing expo voting seeder #613

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

SpencerKaiser
Copy link
Contributor

Pre-Requisites

  • Yes, I updated Authors.md OR this is not my first contribution
  • Yes, I included and/or modified tests to cover relevent code OR my change is non-technical
  • Yes, I wrote this code entirely myself OR I properly attributed these changes in Third Party Notices

Description of Changes

Related Issues

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (851dffc) 82.89% compared to head (299abe2) 82.87%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               v3     #613      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.89%   82.87%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         140      140              
  Lines        1543     1542       -1     
  Branches      161      160       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1279     1278       -1     
  Misses        262      262              
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@SpencerKaiser SpencerKaiser marked this pull request as ready for review December 7, 2023 17:53
@SpencerKaiser SpencerKaiser merged commit 6aba925 into v3 Dec 8, 2023
9 checks passed
@SpencerKaiser SpencerKaiser deleted the expo-judging-seeder-spencer branch December 8, 2023 02:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants