Replies: 10 comments 7 replies
-
Hi @DhivinX, yes that works perfectly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've made a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
When generating typedocs, should they be generated from each package's |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@xeolabs I saw you started some fix for tsconfigs. Generally, I wanted to create two packages in the repo, if possible, in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes this sounds good to me. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Two more points occurred to me:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey guys, I have one question, cause I get the idea of having develop branch and protecting the main one, but could you please explain to me the reason of switching default branch into develop? Shouldn't the main branch still be the default one? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As I understand it, "develop" is the default branch because when contributors want to branch-and-PR they would be making the branch off "develop". Also, "main" wont contain anything until there is releasable code in "develop" to merge into it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @DhivinX I'm having trouble getting things to build and I can't figure out what's not working. Could you please take a look? I'm doing a fresh clone, then checking out the
If you can see anything that stands out, that would be much appreciated. AKAIK I can't see anything I broke with the configs etc.. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Nice, that working now, thanks @DhivinX |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello!
We could add Github Actions configuration to automate the publishing of packages when changes are pushed to the main branch. You would need to add a develop branch for the current code and a main branch would be the alive branch. Then when we merge the develop branch into main it would automatically publish the packages to the registry.
Then the workflow looks like this:
feature
orfix
branch fromdevelop
branch (ex. feat/register-form)develop
develop
tomain
We could set the
main
branch as a protected branch, so that no one can commit directly tomain
, only PR fromdevelop
.What do you think?
Please share any thoughts.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions