New Design Needed for Senate

[thanisara-r]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Senate's info is grouped by the former approach and cannot be applied to the existing senators.

Describe the solution you'd like
Group the current senate by provinces?

[beambeambeam]

Suggest based on 20 social and professional groups, as it's a role that they pick to be in the Senate.
And provinces should be subordinate to the Senate election district? but still, an idea of provinces will be much easier to understand.

[Th1nkK1D]

Suggest based on 20 social and professional groups, as it's a role that they pick to be in the Senate. And provinces should be subordinate to the Senate election district? but still, an idea of provinces will be much easier to understand.

I agree with 20 social and professional groups and provinces that are used when senate candidates register for the election.

From the data perspective, we do have appointmentMethod and province columns. The easiest fix would be to put professional groups in appointmentMethod and their registered province as province. For the long term, we might need to think if the term appointmentMethod is generalized enough.

[Th1nkK1D]

** Senate's info is grouped by the former approach and cannot be applied to the existing senators.

@thanisara-r It shows no data because we literally have no data in the appointmentMethod and province columns for the latest term of Senate. (We should try adding data first, then there might be some code we need to change)