Indicate who is responsible for generating example documents

[jeswr]

To improve readability, it would be useful to have:

• For each example scenario have a table indicating who the entities of interest are; e.g. for the windsurfing example: surfer = holder, race organiser = verifier, equipment manufacturer(s) = issuer.
• Who (holder, issuer, verifier) is responsible for generating the document displayed in the example, and who, if anyone it is sent to - e.g. in example 113 I my understanding is that the Mandatory Pointers are created by the race organiser / verifier and sent to the surfer / holder who then generates example 114; but I am not confident of this understanding.

[Wind4Greg]

Hi @jeswr this example has been flagged in another issue (#86) as problematic. I've proposed that we drop the example as the simplest solution as we already have two other ECDSA-SD examples. Let me know if this resolves this issue for you.

[jeswr]

The key ask here is to label who (holder, issuer, verifier) is responsible for generating the document displayed in every example.

Example 113 is one of the places this is most useful, but not the only one. So removing example 113 does not resolve the issue.

[Wind4Greg]

Hmm, maybe this is a bigger picture issue rather than an example/test vector issue.

In the non-selective disclosure case:

1. Issuer uses appropriate Create Proof procedure
2. Verifier uses appropriate Verify Proof procedure

Test vectors do not go through the verification procedure so verifier is not involved.

In the selective disclosure case:

1. Issuer uses Create Base Proof
2. Holder uses Add Derived Proof
3. Verifier uses Verify Derived Proof

Test vectors do not go through the verification procedure so verifier is not involved.

Do you just want this change on Appendix A? Can you give specific wording?