You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What do you mean I'm referencing an outdated TR from 2018? This is the latest published version, and all the quotes in this issue are taken directly from it. Specifically, the issue regarding "available space" originates from this version.
Why isn't this considered a bug in the specification? While many things in drafts reflect improvements and enhancements, the current published version should, at the very least, be correct, shouldn't it?
For example, why hasn't the link for width been updated? How can common reader make sense of things ? If the logic is to always goto the latest draft to verify things, than what's the value of the published version ?
Having the latest /TR be six years old is suboptimal and misleading.
The changes list in the ED needs updating, and it does not capture all resolutions to date. The first one is much less effort to fix, and would allow publishing a CR Draft.
What do you mean I'm referencing an outdated TR from 2018? This is the latest published version, and all the quotes in this issue are taken directly from it. Specifically, the issue regarding "available space" originates from this version.
Why isn't this considered a bug in the specification? While many things in drafts reflect improvements and enhancements, the current published version should, at the very least, be correct, shouldn't it?
For example, why hasn't the link for width been updated? How can common reader make sense of things ? If the logic is to always goto the latest draft to verify things, than what's the value of the published version ?
Originally posted by @gitspeaks in #11392 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: