-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Always run on 1 core CPU only #39
Comments
Would you please let me know your cpu's specifications? |
This is interesting as i am running all 24 cores and getting 16,000 - 18,000 k/s on the BTC Puzzle CPU used: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 4.20 GHz Should i be getting more than that? EDIT: I just tried by selecting 1 core and getting solid 14,000 k/s but only 2,000 more if i use 24 cores which doesnt seem right. |
I guess it's because of using threads instead of processes. Processes don't share memory, that's why I used threads. |
Yes, I think so. |
Hey @vlnahp i had a random questio of the backing of this bug report here. |
Yes it's possible. But I need some time to do some research about threading and GIL lock. |
Should I try to fix this if you are busy now? |
Yes I'm busy. I believe it is not possible to keep the |
Okay, let me give it a try first |
Taking advantage of the GPUs it will be even faster |
Hello 👋 how did you go with this after giving it a try? Keen to know if you found a way or possibility. Thank you. |
Hello folks! Anyone found anything with balance? |
Hey PopeDollar I have been using the offline brute and targeting one BTC address for about 2 months straight now via a laptop & no such luck yet. I do believe some here have found gold 👍👍 It's all luck at the end of the day as chances are slim to none. |
Finding a key is like finding a grain of sand in the whole universe. You could search for millions of years without even scratching the surface ;)
|
Hi @vlnahp I hope all is well with your studies. I can appreciate how busy you are of course! Lu5Goon |
Hello! |
I made a mini version to try out tasks instead of a pool: You can try this one and tell if it works. |
Hi All, Been a while! Just wanted to check and see if this bug has been fixed or looked into? 👍👍 |
I will try to do this on the weekend or next week. |
Hey folks, I made this PR to solve this issue. I hope that I can have more time to do more but that's all |
Never....Even if you use fastecdsa and secp256k1 as ice at best it can handle 3MK/s. Which takes about a couple of billion years to find something. Even using Pollard's kangaroo algorithm *(~200 Petakeys/s per thread) takes you a few hundred years if you don't know the public key and the range the key is in. But don't worry, we like to play like children. |
No matter how many cores I choose, it always runs on only one core.
It reflects on the Task Manager as well as the "current rate" metrics as well.
I guess that we need to use
Process
to achieve it?from multiprocessing import cpu_count, Process
Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22700164/python-running-multiple-processes-simultaneously
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: