Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[backport: rls/2025.4.0-rls] Changed stream handling in RNG clone (#3084) #3096

Closed

Conversation

Alexandr-Solovev
Copy link
Contributor

@Alexandr-Solovev Alexandr-Solovev commented Feb 24, 2025

Backport of #3084


PR should start as a draft, then move to ready for review state after CI is passed and all applicable checkboxes are closed.
This approach ensures that reviewers don't spend extra time asking for regular requirements.

You can remove a checkbox as not applicable only if it doesn't relate to this PR in any way.
For example, PR with docs update doesn't require checkboxes for performance while PR with any change in actual code should have checkboxes and justify how this code change is expected to affect performance (or justification should be self-evident).

Checklist to comply with before moving PR from draft:

PR completeness and readability

  • I have reviewed my changes thoroughly before submitting this pull request.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes or created a separate PR with update and provided its number in the description, if necessary.
  • Git commit message contains an appropriate signed-off-by string (see CONTRIBUTING.md for details).
  • I have added a respective label(s) to PR if I have a permission for that.
  • I have resolved any merge conflicts that might occur with the base branch.

Testing

  • I have run it locally and tested the changes extensively.
  • All CI jobs are green or I have provided justification why they aren't.
  • I have extended testing suite if new functionality was introduced in this PR.

Performance

N/A for backport.

@Alexandr-Solovev Alexandr-Solovev marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2025 11:12
@Alexandr-Solovev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/intelci: run

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant