static lifetime for CloseFrame in ws::Message::Close

[sukhmel]

Hello,

I've been wondering why ws::Message has its variant defined as Close(Option<CloseFrame<'static>>).
Is it because of some limitation of ws implementation, because of the hard-to-express lifetime, because you did not want ws::Message to have mostly useless lifetime specifier, or for some other reason?

It's usually not a problem but sometimes for better diagnosis, it would be simpler to be able to pass dynamic data. If that's something that may/should be fixed, I may give it a try, but if that's not desired, that's also fine

[davidpdrsn]

You can pass dynamic data. The lifetime is used in a Cow<‘static, str> which means either a &’static str or a dynamic String. It doesn’t require a &’static str.

[sukhmel]

Oh, that's just me failing to use `Cow` property then, thank you for a clarification. чт, 29 июн. 2023 г., 19:54 David Pedersen ***@***.***>:

…

You can pass dynamic data. The lifetime is used in a Cow<‘static, str> which means either a &’static str or a dynamic String. It doesn’t require a &’static str. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2065 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMJBCOFNTMDLJVW6D372K3XNWQLXANCNFSM6AAAAAAZYUS5G4> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>