-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CFB path separators aren't properly handled #22
Comments
Thanks, works fine! Tested in my tiny R package locally and in the CI. |
Great, thank you! I also tested this on Windows and Ubuntu with an Excel VBA project created on Windows, and things work as expected. I'm not sure how to incorporate that into a CI pipeline (your link gets me to a 404, unfortunately). Ideas are welcome. Version 0.7.0 incorporates the fixes in path separator handling. Version 0.7.1, published shortly after, addresses an (inconsequential) safety issue. Just letting you know in case RUSTSEC-2023-0086 surfaces at your end (it probably will since your Cargo.lock file references the affected crate). Updating to 0.7.1 silences this warning; previous versions aren't vulnerable either since the problematic code is never exercised. |
Thanks for the heads up! Regarding the tests: I also see the 404, odd. I have a basic functionality test in my R package (the R package simply wraps the two functions shown in your For reference my test and the gh-actions runs, these might not be publicly available. |
PR #21 surfaced an issue with path separators as interpreted by the
cfb
crate, that isn't currently honored by this implementation.@JanMarvin Could you verify that the update on the
feature/path_sep
branch works for you? The following entry in your Cargo.toml file should pull in the latest changes:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: