This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 635
Are the tf_cnn_benchmarks deprecated and replaced by MLPerf? #436
Comments
I moved to a new team. I seem them as deprecated. Before I moved I
focused is on the official models the TensorFlow/models/official because
that pushed the high level apis to be faster.
…On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, 8:38 AM Vilmara ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @tfboyd <https://github.com/tfboyd>, are the tf_cnn_benchmarks
deprecated and replaced by MLPerf?. You have mentioned at #407
<#407> that
"tf_cnn_benchmarks is deprecated going into TF 2.0. It is still a great
tool pre-TF 2.0. The new "perf tools" are different and focus on end user
performance". For "the new perf tools" do you mean MLPerf training
benchmarks?.
I am testing the tf_cnn_benchmarks master branch with the TF version
tf-nightly-gpu 2.1.0.dev20191112 and it is throwing the error ImportError
No module named contrib.data.python.ops. I see also the repo hasn't been
updated for a while (the last update was 7 months ago).
Could you please provide further comments and recommendations on what
benchmarks we should use according to the test goal, and maybe updating the
README file with that info?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#436?email_source=notifications&email_token=AFTF5MSCAFKGAXVQE63EQ43QTV5I3A5CNFSM4JNOMCGKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HZL6YQQ>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFTF5MXMGMYZIARR72ZXHFLQTV5I3ANCNFSM4JNOMCGA>
.
|
@tfboyd thanks for your prompt reply, do you know if there is somebody else still administrating this benchmark repo? |
Reed would know.
…On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, 8:50 AM Vilmara ***@***.***> wrote:
@tfboyd <https://github.com/tfboyd> thanks for your prompt reply, do you
know if there is somebody else still administrating this benchmark repo?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#436?email_source=notifications&email_token=AFTF5MRIFTFI2PPPPXTSAL3QTV6U7A5CNFSM4JNOMCGKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEECQFFA#issuecomment-553976468>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFTF5MW32TJ4A6O7BC7R5MDQTV6U7ANCNFSM4JNOMCGA>
.
|
Yes, tf_cnn_benchmarks is no longer maintained. I just updated the repo to support TF2, but will not do any further updates. It is now recommended to use the TensorFlow Official |
hi @reedwm. Does the tf_cnn_benchmark.py script work with TensorFlow Official Models?. Or do you recommend getting rid of this repo at all? |
tf_cnn_benchmarks.py does not work with the TensorFlow Official Models. Each official model has their own Python script you need to run. I recommend not using this repo anymore (except for PerfZero), and using the Official Models instead. |
@reedwm duly noted, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi @tfboyd, are the tf_cnn_benchmarks deprecated and replaced by MLPerf?. You have mentioned at #407 that "tf_cnn_benchmarks is deprecated going into TF 2.0. It is still a great tool pre-TF 2.0. The new "perf tools" are different and focus on end user performance". For "the new perf tools" do you mean MLPerf training benchmarks?.
I am testing the tf_cnn_benchmarks master branch with the TF version tf-nightly-gpu 2.1.0.dev20191112 and it is throwing the error
ImportError No module named contrib.data.python.ops
. I see also the repo hasn't been updated for a while (the last update was 7 months ago).Could you please provide further comments and recommendations on what benchmarks we should use according to the test goal, and maybe updating the README file with that info?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: