Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export DwC to SKOS #537

Open
martinaPulieri opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Export DwC to SKOS #537

martinaPulieri opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
Format - SKOS Issues related to a SKOS representation of DwC terms

Comments

@martinaPulieri
Copy link

Dear team,
as suggested by @timrobertson100 during the last workshop on "Interoperability solutions adopted by research infrastructures" organised by Yann Le Franc in collaboration with Biodiversa+, we want express our interest and availability in formalising DarwinCore terms list into a SKOS controlled vocabulary. We work for the italian node of the LifeWatch ERIC research infrastructure and we manage the EcoPortal catalogue of semantic artefacts in ecological and biodiversity domain. We have an in-house editing tool called VocBench that we use to create and publish semantic artfecats (e.g. thesauri, glossaries, ontologies) into EcoPortal. If there is a common interest in achieving such objective please get in touch at [email protected] to proceed with this task.

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

I think what would be most useful is to start with scripts to generate the controlled vocabulary every time a release is made, place the resulting artifact in https://github.com/tdwg/dwc/tree/master/dist, and then add appropriate links and documentation for it in the Quick Reference Guide.

@tucotuco tucotuco added the Format - SKOS Issues related to a SKOS representation of DwC terms label Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Format - SKOS Issues related to a SKOS representation of DwC terms
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants