-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PerformEval should be modified to use xStr for the rest of the algorithm #21
Comments
That's what tc39/ecma262#3294 does, so answer is yes. |
fred-wang
added a commit
to fred-wang/proposal-dynamic-code-brand-checks
that referenced
this issue
Nov 27, 2024
This aligns with tc39/ecma262#3294 closes tc39#21
fred-wang
added a commit
to fred-wang/proposal-dynamic-code-brand-checks
that referenced
this issue
Nov 27, 2024
This aligns with tc39/ecma262#3294 closes tc39#21
fred-wang
added a commit
to fred-wang/proposal-dynamic-code-brand-checks
that referenced
this issue
Nov 27, 2024
This aligns with tc39/ecma262#3294 closes tc39#21
fred-wang
added a commit
to fred-wang/proposal-dynamic-code-brand-checks
that referenced
this issue
Nov 27, 2024
This aligns with tc39/ecma262#3294 closes tc39#21
fred-wang
added a commit
to fred-wang/proposal-dynamic-code-brand-checks
that referenced
this issue
Nov 27, 2024
This aligns with tc39/ecma262#3294 closes tc39#21
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
See https://tc39.es/proposal-dynamic-code-brand-checks/#sec-performeval
We determine a xStr value that we use for HostEnsureCanCompileStrings.
However, the x value is also used at step 11)a) of https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-performeval
I assume the intention is to use xStr here too?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: