We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(anonymous) ✖ should be equivalent at Test.<anonymous> (...) <green>actual</green> <red>expected</red> { a: <red>fals</red><green>tru</green>e, b: false }
I think the output for objects that are not equal has potential for being improved.
It would be nice with something more like:
{ a: true, // actual a: false, // expected b: false, }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@tjconcept checkout https://github.com/tap-format/spec and see if that has better formatting for. It's the successor to this library and, in my opinion, is much nicer.
Let me know.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@scottcorgan you linked me to this very same repository?
Ha, whoops. I was so used to tap-spec getting issues like this.
tap-spec
I agree the object output could be better then. I'd love to see any ideas you might have as far is implementation.
I sadly don't have the time currently, but I'll leave it here if someone pops by and wants to contribute.
No branches or pull requests
I think the output for objects that are not equal has potential for being improved.
It would be nice with something more like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: