Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement]: Strimzi Metrics Reporter support #10753

Open
OwenCorrigan76 opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

[Enhancement]: Strimzi Metrics Reporter support #10753

OwenCorrigan76 opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@OwenCorrigan76
Copy link
Contributor

OwenCorrigan76 commented Oct 23, 2024

Related problem

Strimzi Metrics Reporter is a new project under the Strimzi organization that directly exposes metrics via an HTTP endpoint in the Prometheus format. We should add support for it to Strimzi. The motivation for creating the new Metrics Reporter can be found in this proposal.

Suggested solution

There are several stages that would need to be added for this enhancement, including:

  • The metrics reporter binaries must be added in the 3rd party libs
  • API in the api module must be created -> that generates the custom resource definitions
  • KafkaClusterSpec needs to be updated to allow for the new Metrics Reporter
  • KafkaBrokerConfiguration and other classes need to be updated to handle the logic
@im-konge
Copy link
Member

Triaged on 31.10.2024: This makes sense to implement.

@smilingprogrammer
Copy link

Hi everyone. I am new to the strimzi community.

I want to start contributing to the strimzi project. Is this a fair open issue i can start with?

@scholzj
Copy link
Member

scholzj commented Dec 12, 2024

No, sorry, I think @OwenCorrigan76 is working on this already. Best is to look for issues with the help wanted or good start labels.

@smilingprogrammer
Copy link

Thank you @scholzj

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants