You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, I'd suggest to rename the parameter to include_insignificant (insignificant), or to change the implementation that on default it only returns the insignificant parameters, which would be weird though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So, I'd suggest to rename the parameter to include_insignificant (insignificant), or to change the implementation that on default it only returns the insignificant parameters, which would be weird though.
The former suggestion sounds better. I see the include_significant is just a typo and expected behavior is to return only significant parameters on default.
The later suggestion of changing default behavior is a major change that can cause some problems in existing codes.
@daveFNbuck
I saw you were involved in the latest revision of this method. Do you have any idea on the expected behavior?
I made a related pull-request (#3168) before seeing this issue.
This request is accidently equivalent to the former suggestion of renaming include_significant.
The classmethod
Task.get_param_names
has either a really confusingly misnamed parameterinclude_significant
, or the implementation has a bug.Example:
So, I'd suggest to rename the parameter to
include_insignificant
(insignificant), or to change the implementation that on default it only returns the insignificant parameters, which would be weird though.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: