Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: search cloud services #162

Open
lexoyo opened this issue Oct 24, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Feature request: search cloud services #162

lexoyo opened this issue Oct 24, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@lexoyo
Copy link
Member

lexoyo commented Oct 24, 2019

Following this discussion in CE2 repo, I create an issue here for a new unifile feature

As services like dropbox offer an API to search files and folders (names and content and metadata), I would like to add a search box in CE2 for such services (not for the others like FTP)

You can see where I am going from there @JbIPS, could you give it a thought and we could discuss the implementation here?

@JbIPS
Copy link
Collaborator

JbIPS commented Oct 24, 2019

You know my position on API that are not replicated on all services 😊

But GitHub must have something like that and fs has find. For other, we could have a more manual approach with warnings about the slowness of the operation.

@lexoyo
Copy link
Member Author

lexoyo commented Oct 24, 2019

Yes why not... I guess it is not only the time it takes but also we can not find content of files with ftp for example

@lexoyo
Copy link
Member Author

lexoyo commented Oct 24, 2019

I guess another solution would be to create a separate project just for search? How would it share auth with unifile?

@JbIPS
Copy link
Collaborator

JbIPS commented Oct 24, 2019

I forgot about content and metadata. That's a problem...

Does it have to do that? I mean it's easier to limit the search on Dropbox than to do it in FTP.

And regarding another project, the only solution would be to clone unifile-dropbox and use it directly without the Unifile layer. But I'm not very fond of this solution 😕

@JbIPS
Copy link
Collaborator

JbIPS commented Oct 24, 2019

And to be honest, we could do it in FTP, by getting a file content and scanning it. That would be huge and heavy, but doable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants