Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Develop and implement an advocacy campaign to encourage companies to provide funds for maintaining research software projects #38

Open
dr-eric-jensen opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Activity: Advocacy This is an activity that involves supporting or promoting a particular research software policy Activity This is a policy activity Effort: Small Less than 1 person-year estimated to deliver this. Topic: Maintenance Topics pertaining to research software maintenance

Comments

@dr-eric-jensen
Copy link
Collaborator

Potential Activity Scope
This proposed advocacy campaign could aim to engage companies in a concerted effort to provide funds and direct these funds into maintaining research software projects. The campaign could recognize the mutual interests, benefits, and responsibilities of both academic software projects and companies, seeking to foster a culture of collaboration, co-investment, and co-creation.

Key features of the campaign could include:

  • Partnership with Industry: The campaign could engage companies across sectors, recognizing the shared value of supporting research software projects. This could include crafting compelling messages and creating platforms for collaboration.
  • Joint Review Process: A core component could be the establishment of a joint academic-industry review process, involving reviewers from both academic software projects and the companies. This could ensure a transparent allocation of funds.
  • Collaboration with Organizations: Collaboration with organizations such as NumFOCUS or similar entities could enhance the reach and results of the campaign.
  • Alignment with Models: The campaign could draw inspiration from models such as Tidelift.

Potential Objectives

  • To engage companies across sectors in supporting research software projects, recognizing the shared value and fostering a culture of collaboration, co-investment, and co-creation.
  • To craft compelling messages and create platforms for collaboration, appealing to the mutual interests, benefits, and responsibilities of both academic software projects and companies.
  • To consider establishing a joint academic-industry review process, involving reviewers from both academic software projects and the companies, ensuring a transparent and fair allocation of funds.
  • To collaborate with organizations such as NumFOCUS or similar entities, leveraging their networks and expertise to enhance the reach and results of the campaign.
  • To draw inspiration from existing models such as Tidelift, adapting strategies and approaches to suit the specific needs and context of research software maintenance.
  • To implement a communication and engagement strategy, targeting key stakeholders to inspire, inform, and involve them in the campaign.
  • To incorporate an ongoing monitoring and evaluation component, tracking progress, assessing impact, and adapting to emerging trends and feedback.

Targeted Impacts

  • Overall, a more sustainable and supportive ecosystem for research software projects, where companies actively contribute to maintenance, and collaboration, co-investment, and co-creation are the norm.
  • Strengthened collaboration and alignment between academic software projects and companies, fostering a sense of shared purpose and mutual benefit.
  • Engaged and mobilized stakeholders, building momentum and support for the campaign.

This potential activity was curated as part of "Charting the Course: Policy and Planning for Sustainable Research Software," a Sloan Foundation-funded project within URSSI dedicated to supporting the future of research software through evidence-informed policy work (Project contacts are: @danielskatz and @dr-eric-jensen). If you are interested in working on this, please add a comment.

@dr-eric-jensen dr-eric-jensen added Effort: Small Less than 1 person-year estimated to deliver this. Activity: Advocacy This is an activity that involves supporting or promoting a particular research software policy labels Aug 24, 2023
@danielskatz danielskatz added the Activity This is a policy activity label Aug 30, 2023
@dr-eric-jensen dr-eric-jensen added the Topic: Maintenance Topics pertaining to research software maintenance label Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Activity: Advocacy This is an activity that involves supporting or promoting a particular research software policy Activity This is a policy activity Effort: Small Less than 1 person-year estimated to deliver this. Topic: Maintenance Topics pertaining to research software maintenance
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants