Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MP3 vs WAV files as reference tracks #71

Open
cdog14113 opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

MP3 vs WAV files as reference tracks #71

cdog14113 opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@cdog14113
Copy link

If I use a MP3 file as the reference track, when mastering a track that is a WAV file will this give me lesser results? Is there a difference between using a MP3 as a reference track and a WAV file? And if there is, how big of a difference is there?

@sergree
Copy link
Owner

sergree commented Dec 12, 2024

MP3 has lossy compression artifacts. In some cases it will be not an issue, but sometimes it may become critical. Usually mp3 has problems with ultra-high and ultra-low frequencies, so i'd recommend to use wav/flac or mp3 320kbps.
MP3 less than 192kbps will provide not best results because the tool will match not correct frequencies, but frequencies of compression artifacts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants