-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add chainId parameter on decoder endpoint #73
Conversation
5b18ae6
to
c4861a6
Compare
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12884889715Details
💛 - Coveralls |
"type": "function", | ||
}, | ||
], | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would preffer ABIS in mock files to keep clean the tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, I will merge both PRs and then do it, if not I will have to fix conflicts
client: TestClient | ||
|
||
@classmethod | ||
def setUpClass(cls): | ||
cls.client = TestClient(app) | ||
|
||
def setUp(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should uses async setup and async teardown?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the functions inside are not async, I wouldn't
chain_id
support for decoding endpoint #71