Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add chainId parameter on decoder endpoint #73

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Uxio0
Copy link
Member

@Uxio0 Uxio0 commented Jan 20, 2025

@Uxio0 Uxio0 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 20, 2025 15:47
@Uxio0 Uxio0 force-pushed the add-chain-id-endpoint branch from 5b18ae6 to c4861a6 Compare January 21, 2025 10:23
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12884889715

Details

  • 40 of 40 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+1.3%) to 96.382%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12866778006: 1.3%
Covered Lines: 1785
Relevant Lines: 1852

💛 - Coveralls

"type": "function",
},
],
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would preffer ABIS in mock files to keep clean the tests.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, I will merge both PRs and then do it, if not I will have to fix conflicts

client: TestClient

@classmethod
def setUpClass(cls):
cls.client = TestClient(app)

def setUp(self):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should uses async setup and async teardown?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the functions inside are not async, I wouldn't

@Uxio0 Uxio0 merged commit 739d9f6 into main Jan 22, 2025
5 checks passed
@Uxio0 Uxio0 deleted the add-chain-id-endpoint branch January 22, 2025 15:16
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add chain_id support for decoding endpoint
3 participants