From 2c5a84371550978695d3ea55667701774a51ea21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Curly Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 08:50:35 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update RFC, MCP, FCP and CFT sections for TWiR-581 --- draft/2025-01-08-this-week-in-rust.md | 54 ++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/draft/2025-01-08-this-week-in-rust.md b/draft/2025-01-08-this-week-in-rust.md index c3624ad2a..a5c0d683e 100644 --- a/draft/2025-01-08-this-week-in-rust.md +++ b/draft/2025-01-08-this-week-in-rust.md @@ -54,19 +54,23 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category. [submit_crate]: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704 ## Calls for Testing - An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward: - - - - +### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing) +* *No calls for testing were issued this week.* + +### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing) +* [Tracking issue for RFC 3695: Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131204) + - [Testing steps](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131204#issuecomment-2569314526) + +### [Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing) +* *No calls for testing were issued this week.* + +If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new `call-for-testing` +label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature +need testing. ### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing) @@ -117,15 +121,7 @@ If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please s Changes to Rust follow the Rust [RFC (request for comments) process](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs). These are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week: - - - - - +* *No RFCs were approved this week.* ### Final Comment Period @@ -133,31 +129,29 @@ Every week, [the team](https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html) announces the 'final which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now. #### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period) - - - +* [Explicit ABIs in extern](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3722) #### Tracking Issues & PRs - - - - - ##### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc) +* [Tracking Issue for `float_next_up_down`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91399) +* [Impl TryFrom> for String](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132268) +* [Tracking Issue for anonymous pipe API](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127154) +* [Convert `struct FromBytesWithNulError` into enum](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134143) ##### [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc) +* [simplify SourceID Ord/Eq](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/14980) ##### [Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+) +* *No Language Team Proposals entered Final Comment Period this week.* ##### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc) +* *No Language Reference RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* ##### [Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc) +* *No Unsafe Code Guideline Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* #### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls) - - - - +* *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* ## Upcoming Events