Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve policy package deployment docs #456

Open
rdimaio opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Improve policy package deployment docs #456

rdimaio opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
operator Operator documentation

Comments

@rdimaio
Copy link
Contributor

rdimaio commented Jan 31, 2025

Initial MD table for reference

Approach / columns Ease of setup Amount of work needed for new Rucio and new policy package versions Extra external dependencies at runtime
Init container - from an index or Git repository Easy Index (e.g. PyPI) or Git registry (e.g. GitLab) in question
(if a new policy package version is released)
Dockerfile with build arguments for policy package Easy - Building + hosting the image yourself
- Rebuilding the image
- Redeploying
Registry where you host the image
(no more risk than what is already there,
assuming your registry is as reliable as DockerHub)
Create secret and deploy via Flux Medium - Need to duplicate actual policy package content into Flux configuration None
Cronjob that creates a secret policy and applies it Medium - Semi-automation of Flux secret approach None
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
operator Operator documentation
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant