details of artefact
+Felis sagittis eget tempus primis in faucibus vestibulum.
+Initial Post +
+ The post focuses on the “Case: Medical Implant Risk Analysis” case study (Association for Computing Machinery, 2018). Corazón's approach to medical technology aligns with several principles of the British Computer Society (BCS) Code of Conduct (British Computer Society, ND). With the BCS's emphasis on the public interest (Principle 1), Corazón has shown a commitment to public health and security, supported by good product design. Initiatives like providing free access to certain groups aligns with the BCS's aim for equal access to IT benefits (Principle 1d). This aligns with Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Principle 1.1 (Association for Computing Machinery, ND). BCS Principle 2 is professional competence and integrity. Corazón works within their professional competence (2a), by adhering to regulatory standards and using standard cryptographic algorithms. This aligns with ACM Principle 2.3. The open bug bounty program is an open approach to ongoing improvement (2c), aligning with ACM Principle 2.9 - a proactive approach to identifying potential vulnerabilities. The company has a duty to the relevant authority (Principle 3) and need to use professional judgment carefully (3a). They responded promptly to the vulnerability disclosure which showed professional responsibility (3c). @@ -59,7 +61,8 @@
In my initial post, I analysed how the medical device company Corazón's practices aligned with principles from the BCS Code of Conduct and ACM Code of Ethics, highlighting their commitment to public health, equal access, professional standards, and vulnerability response. +
In my initial post, I analysed how the medical device company Corazón's practices aligned with principles from the BCS Code of Conduct and ACM Code of Ethics, highlighting their commitment to public health, equal access, professional standards, and vulnerability response. Alex's response (Mutebe, 2024) suggested further focus on the legal and social landscape around medical implants. He raised concerns about whether Corazón adequately disclosed risks to patients and the potential erosion of patient trust due to cybersecurity issues. Alex argued Corazón needs to deeply consider ethical design principles to respect individual rights and societal values. While their charitable access promotes equity, broader equity challenges may remain. Sahr recommended (Sumana, 2024) considering breaches such as the disclosed wireless vulnerability. He cited research on the challenges manufacturers face balancing safety, affordability and usability for implants. This might explain why the manufacturer has fallen short of ethical principles. While I linked Corazón's practices to ethical codes (Association for Computing Machinery, ND; British Computer Society, ND), the responses of peers’ highlighted important areas including risk disclosure, ethical design, patient trust, equity, and inherent safety/usability trade-offs for implantable devices. @@ -70,22 +73,15 @@
Felis sagittis eget tempus primis in faucibus vestibulum. Blandit adipiscing eu felis iaculis volutpat ac adipiscing accumsan eu faucibus. Integer ac pellentesque praesent tincidunt felis sagittis eget. tempus euismod. Magna sed etiam ante ipsum primis in faucibus vestibulum. Blandit adipiscing eu ipsum primis in faucibus vestibulum. Blandit adipiscing eu felis iaculis volutpat ac adipiscing accumsan eu faucibus lorem ipsum.
-Felis sagittis eget tempus primis in faucibus vestibulum. Blandit adipiscing eu felis iaculis volutpat ac adipiscing accumsan eu faucibus. Integer ac pellentesque praesent tincidunt felis sagittis eget. tempus euismod. Magna sed etiam ante ipsum primis in faucibus vestibulum. Blandit adipiscing eu ipsum primis in faucibus vestibulum. Blandit adipiscing eu felis iaculis volutpat ac adipiscing accumsan eu faucibus lorem ipsum.
+Felis sagittis eget tempus primis in faucibus vestibulum.
Felis sagittis eget tempus primis in faucibus vestibulum.
+